论文部分内容阅读
针对康菲中国溢油损害赔偿诉讼中法律适用溯及既往的合法性和法律程序进行法理分析,提出并论证对于海洋生态损害赔偿可以在我国《海洋生态损害国家索赔条例》正式实施后溯及既往地适用的合法性。提出对于赔偿范围的确定,可以在即将发布的《海洋生态损害国家索赔条例》中明确规定《海洋溢油生态损害评估技术导则》的法律适用。论证国家海洋局溯及既往地撤销已经发放的渤海石油开发许可的合法性。通过归纳各国法院承认纯经济损失赔偿案例的各种情形,演绎出对传统海事法进行突破从而解开油污损害纯经济损失戈耳迪难结的限定条件,对将康菲中国溢油事件所造成的纯经济损失纳入损害赔偿范围的合法性进行法理分析。
A legal analysis of the legality and legal procedure of applying the law applicable to ConocoPhillips China’s oil spill damage compensation litigation is proposed and argued that the compensation for marine ecological damage can be retrospectively implemented after the formal implementation of the “National Claims for Marine Ecological Damage” The legitimacy of the application. Proposed for the determination of the scope of compensation, the forthcoming promulgation of the “Marine Ecological Damage National Claims Regulations,” clearly defined “marine oil spill ecological damage Assessment Technical Guidelines” of the law. Demonstrate that the State Oceanic Administration retroactively repealed the legitimacy of the Bohai oil exploitation permit already issued. By summing up various cases in which courts recognize the case of pure economic damages, it deduces the limited conditions for the break-through of traditional maritime law to solve the economic damage caused by oil pollution and thus makes it difficult for Conrad to cause oil spills in China. The pure economic loss into the scope of the damage compensation legality analysis.