论文部分内容阅读
这是一个真实的故事。 1996年,当文化部决定对中央直属院团进行全员考核、聘任的时候,某乐团自行召开了有四五十个人参加的会议,集体批判、谴责部长刘忠德,说是破坏了他们乐团的一个美好的现状。而实际上,被众人极力保护的“美好的现状”却是另一种状况:在此会议前不久,一个外国著名指挥家刚刚和这个乐团合作完,一个中国记者采访了他。这位指挥家毫不客气地说:“这样的乐团,好像没有经过科班训练一样,根本没有希望。” 1997年,在艰苦的改革实现之后,刘忠德部长又请这位指挥家来和这个乐团合作,还请那名记者去访问他。这一次,这位指挥家激动地赞叹道:“真没想到,这么短的时间内,一个乐团能有这么大的变化,这是一个充满生机和希望的乐团。” 同一个乐团、同一位指挥家、同一名记者,在短短一年的时间里,居然得出了两个完全不同的结论,这也正是我们感兴趣的话题——
this is a true story. In 1996, when the Ministry of Culture decided to conduct a full-scale examination and appointment of the directly affiliated hospital affiliated to the Central Government, a certain orchestra convened a meeting of 40 or 50 people in its own right to collectively criticize and condemn Minister Liu Zhongde as one that destroyed their orchestra Beautiful situation. In fact, the “beautiful status quo”, which was strongly protected by everyone, is yet another situation: Not long ago, a famous foreign conductor just finished working with the orchestra and a Chinese reporter interviewed him. The conductor said bluntly: “Such an orchestra does not seem to have any hope of being trained without Coban training.” In 1997, after the hard reform was achieved, Minister Liu Zhongde asked the conductor to come to this Orchestra cooperation, but also asked the reporter to visit him. This time, the conductor exclaimed excitedly: “I did not realize that in such a short period of time, a band can make such a big change. It is a lively and hopey orchestra.” "The same orchestra, same Bit conductor, the same reporter, in a short period of time, actually come to two completely different conclusions, and this is exactly what we are interested in -