论文部分内容阅读
在文献中涉及的大多数关于地震发生与实际周期事件之间假设存在的相关性被证明是谬误的,或者是由于未能运用正确的统计上的调查研究所致;对这种相关性通俗的假设通常是基于不严格地采用后验推理的方法而作出的。然而,即便固体潮应力与地震的应力降相比很小,但固体潮可能触发地震仍然是一个值得注意的假说。众所周知,固体潮是周期较短的地球振荡的最大应力源。在许多情况下,地震与固体潮的相关性被大量余震所掩盖,因为余震较容易被认为与其主震有关,而与固体潮无关。反过来说,就是未能足够地考虑到成丛的余震可能导致地震与固体潮的视相关性。迄今为止,对这种不包括余震的相关性所作的大多数的系统研究已被证明都是毫无意义的。
Most of the pertinent information involved in the literature on the hypotheses existing between the occurrence of an earthquake and the actual cyclical event proved to be false or due to the failure to apply the correct statistical investigation and research; Hypotheses are usually based on a method that does not strictly apply a posteriori inference. However, even if the tidal stress of solid is small compared to the stress drop of the earthquake, it is still a notable hypothesis that the solid tide may trigger the earthquake. It is well-known that solid tide is the largest source of stress in short-term earth oscillations. In many cases, the correlation between earthquakes and solid tides is overshadowed by a large number of aftershocks, as aftershocks are more likely to be related to their main shocks than to solid tides. Conversely, it is not enough to consider that crashed aftershocks can lead to the visual correlation between earthquakes and solid tides. To date, most systematic studies of this relevance that do not include aftershocks have proven meaningless.