科学史旨在探究特定个体或机构等对象的教育或职业等轨迹,并就这些对象的知识流动得出相关发现.本文采用了一种不同的方法,通过文献计量分析来探索隶属于希腊和中国机构的个体所留下的知识轨迹.具体面言,通过研究两国机构下个体间的合作出版模式,我们试图找出在发表量、时间跨度和质量(通过引用量衡量)等方面表现出众的个体.根据约翰·克里格的定义,这些个体所呈现出的混合身份最为突出.研究结果表明,核心作者大多数从事于理论物理学领域的研究.可以结合双边研发项目和更为广泛的“一带一路”倡议来审视这些发现,以便该倡议能够为多边科研合作提供另一种视角.“,”The history of science attempts to examine the educational,professional,etc.trajectories of specific individuals,institutions,etc.and draw findings relative to the knowledge flows of these individuals,etc.In this paper,a different approach is used.Bibliometric analysis is employed to examine the knowledge trajectories recorded by individuals affiliated with Greek and Chinese institutions.Specifically,by examining the details of the co-authoring publication pattern between individuals from institutions located in these two countries we seek to identify those who have been over-performing in both the number,the time span and quality (as measured through citations).These individuals are taken to exhibit the most hybrid identity,following Krige's definition.Findings indicate a core of authors mostly engaged in the field of theoretical physics.These findings can be examined in combination with bilateral R&D funding of projects as well as the wider Belt and Road initiative to the extent that the latter provides an alternative view of multilateral science collaboration.