历来治中国书法史者均将书法史作为王朝更替史的附庸物来写。从先秦说到现代,用朝代更替解释书法风格(甚至包括书体)演变的原因,生编硬造出许多似是而非的结论,如晋人尚韵、唐人尚法、宋人尚意之类云云,这类观点陈陈相因,几乎成为当代每个学书者公认的常识。然而,只要稍加推敲,就会发现这种书法史是多么脆弱不堪,比如,就没有一个人能说明白,所谓“韵”、“法”、“意”(还有那种狗尾续貂的评价 History of Chinese calligraphy historians have historians calligraphy history as a replacement for the history of the dependents to write. From the pre-Qin speaks of modern times, explaining the reasons for the evolvement of calligraphy style (even including book style) with the dynastic alternation, the students made a lot of paradoxical conclusions, such as Shang Yun, Tang dynasty Shang dynasty and Song dynasty Chen Chen phase perspective, almost every contemporary school book recognized common sense. However, with a little scrutiny, you will find how fragile this history of calligraphy can be. For example, no one can understand that the so-called “rhyme”, “law”, “meaning” The kind of dog Last Ferret evaluation