论文部分内容阅读
现实中法院往往在判定侵权后,对侵权损害赔偿数额的确定却无从下手。目前大多数专利侵权案件的损害赔偿标准采用的是法定赔偿,但是在确定具体赔偿数额方面却存在较为严重的问题,尤其突出的是赔偿数额高低差异过大、随意性过强。而且在判决书上,对赔偿数额的如何确定理由也是过于简单,只是一笔带过,没有对为何适用法定赔偿方式、确定赔偿数额的依据进行充分说明,使当事人不能信服。本文在收集大量真实案例基础上,分析并确定在哪些情况下适用某种赔偿方法,并试着建立一套较为可行的损害赔偿认定机制。
In reality, the court often determines the amount of damages for infringement after determining the infringement but can not start with it. At present, the standard of compensation for damages in most patent infringement cases is statutory compensation, but there are serious problems in determining the specific amount of compensation. In particular, the difference between the amount of compensation and the amount of arbitration is too great and the randomness is too strong. And in the verdict, the amount of compensation how to determine the reasons is too simple, but a passing, there is no reason why the statutory compensation, the amount of compensation to determine the basis for a full description of the parties can not be convinced. Based on the collection of a large number of real cases, this paper analyzes and determines under what conditions a certain compensation method is applied and tries to establish a more feasible mechanism for determining damages.