论文部分内容阅读
全国第二次清史学术讨论会于1983年9月20日至27日在沈阳举行,出席这次大会的有全国科研、高等院校、出版社、报刊等部门的有关人员一百三十余人,提交大会的论文共有七十多篇.代表们着重就清代各个历史时期的一些重要人物以及评价标准问题进行了比较深入的探讨.有的同志提出:评价历史人物的功过是非,是根据其历史业绩及其社会影响来衡量.如果一个历史人物能较好地解决他当时所面临的社会问题,从而推动社会的发展,就应该肯定;反之,则应否定.至于具体评价明、清之际的历史人物,则必须充分注意历史的复杂性,比如,不能因为肯定清的统一,对降清者就不分清红皂白一律加以肯定,反而对抗清者随意否定.还有同志提出:评价清代历史人物,首要的是把人物放在清代这一特定的历史时期、范围之内来考察.清代是封建社会的后期,是资本主义萌芽、
The Second National Seminar on the History of the Qing Dynasty was held in Shenyang from September 20 to 27, 1983. More than 130 relevant personnel from the departments of scientific research, universities, publishing houses and newspapers and periodicals attended the conference. , Submitted to the conference a total of more than seventy papers.The deputies focused on a number of important historical figures of the Qing Dynasty and evaluation criteria for a more in-depth discussion.A certain comrades suggested: evaluation of historical figures of the meritorious and right and wrong, based on Its historical performance and its social influence.If a historical figure can better solve the social problems he faced at the time to promote the development of society, he should affirm it; on the contrary, it should be denied .As for the specific evaluation, clear For example, we must not affirm the Qing dynasty regardless of indiscriminate affirmation, but we should negate the Qing dynasty at will. There are also comrades who put forward the following points: On behalf of historical figures, the most important thing is to put the figures in the Qing Dynasty this particular historical period, to examine within the scope of the Qing Dynasty is the late feudal society is the seeds of capitalism,