论文部分内容阅读
汉宋之争是清学史上的重要问题,嘉庆中叶编纂的清国史馆《儒林传》初稿,比较集中地反映了这一时期汉宋学术争论的实况。主张汉学的史稿编修者,效仿《明史》中只设儒林传,不为道学家立专传的体例,在具体编修中将主张宋学的桐城学者列入较为时人所轻视的《文苑传》中,以达到扬汉抑宋、为汉学争取儒学正统的目的,以致时至今日,桐城派依然被主要视为一个文学流派,桐城学者也主要被看做是文学家,他们在古文、辞章之外的其他成就,长期没有得到应有的重视。
The debate between Han and Song Dynasties is an important issue in the history of the Qing school. The first draft of the Rulin Biography compiled by the middle Qing Dynasty by Jiaqing reflected the actual situation of the academic debate between Han and Song during this period. Advocating the history of editors of Sinology, following the example of “Confucianism and Taoism,” which is not written by scholars of Taoism, imitates Tongcheng academics who advocated song studies as the more despised persons “Wen Yuan Chuan”, in order to achieve the Yang Han suppression Song, for Confucianism for orthodox orthodox Confucianism, so far, Tongcheng school is still mainly regarded as a genre of literature, Tongcheng scholars are mainly regarded as a writer, they are Ancient writings, other than the achievements of the speech, long-term did not get due attention.