论文部分内容阅读
医疗损害赔偿纠纷中,大多数患者以医方在诊疗过程中存在过失为由,向法院提起侵权损害赔偿之诉,对于医疗过失的认定成了解决案件的关键问题,而实践中医疗侵权案件判决医方存在过失的也不在少数,学理上抽象出“理性人”标准的合理注意义务和当时诊疗水平的相对具体的一般标准,文章从结果回避义务和事实自证两个角度粗略地分析其中的可借鉴之处。过失的认定是归责的基础,如何归责便是过失认定问题中的又一重要问题,笔者参考原因力规则对于责任比例的确定结合案例作了简要分析。
In medical dispute compensation disputes, most of the patients sued the court for tort damages on the ground that the medical malpractice existed in the course of medical treatment. The identification of medical malpractice became the key issue to solve the case. In practice, the judgment of medical tort cases Medical negligence is also not negligible, and theoretically abstracts out the reasonable attention duty of the “rational man” standard and the relatively specific general standard of the current diagnosis and treatment level. The article roughly analyzes from the two aspects of the result avoidance obligation and the fact self-evidence Which can learn from. The determination of negligence is the basis of blame. How to blame is another important issue in the affirmation of negligence. The author makes a brief analysis on the determination of the proportion of blame with reference to the causation rule.