论文部分内容阅读
1 不久前,《天津法制报》刊登了一篇漫谈:《从苏小明请律师谈起》。文章透露,某报去年公开批评海政歌舞团女独唱演员苏小明在某次演出中台风不正,“挑逗观众”;对此,苏小明认为是无中生有,是对她的人身攻击。于是,苏小明到某法律顾问处去,想委托一位律师为代理人,状告某报。而法律顾问处某律师对苏小明说,因为我国还没有《新闻法》,所以律师不能接受苏小明的委托,云云。八月二十日,《中国法制报》在一版下方《暮鼓晨钟》栏内,又刊发了题为《苏小明与<新闻法>》的文章,指出:有人以《新闻法》尚未制定为借口,拒绝为苏小明伸张正义……接着,北京、上海、广州等地,一些报纸都相继在文播栏内,摘发了《中国法制报》或《天津法
Not long ago, the “Tianjin Legal Newspaper” published a talk: “From Su Xiaoming asked a lawyer.” The article revealed that a certain newspaper publicly criticized the solo-actress Su Xiaoming of the party’s political troupes in the past year for making typhoons improperly “tease the audience” in a performance. In response, Su Xiaoming considered it as a personal attack on her. So, Su Xiaoming go to a legal adviser, want to entrust a lawyer for the agent, sued a newspaper. However, a legal counsel attorney told Su Xiaoming that because China does not have a “press law,” lawyers can not accept the commissioned by Su Xiaoming. On August 20, “China Legal Newspaper” published an article titled “Su Xiaoming and ” in the column entitled “Morning Drum and Bell” at the bottom of a version. He pointed out: Some people have not yet formulated the “Press Law” as “ Under the pretext of refusing to justify Su Xiaoming, some newspapers in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and other places successively printed and published ”China’s Legal Newspaper“ or the ”Tianjin Law