论文部分内容阅读
姚馥春、姜蓉樵合着《太极拳讲义》中首次公开了乾隆旧抄本《太极拳谱》,与杨、武诸谱比较,确如书中所言:多出三分之一。西安赵幼斌先生认为杨武诸本是乾隆旧抄本的不完整抄件,是有道理的。因此,研究考证乾隆旧抄本《太极拳谱》就有特殊的意义了。一、流源之考李师融先生认为乾本拳谱是陈耕耘之子陈延熙传许占鳌,许传汤士林,汤传姚姜。考其依据,是《太极拳讲义》中“太极拳流源”一章中:“王宗岳数传至河南蒋发、陈长
Yao Fuchun, Jiang Rongqiao co-author ”Tai Chi Chuan“ for the first time in the Qianlong old transcript ”Tai Chi Fist“, compared with Yang, Wu Zhu spectrum, indeed as the book said: one third more. Mr. Zhao Youbin of Xi’an considers that Yang Wu was an incomplete copy of the old copy of Qianlong. It makes sense. Therefore, research on the old copy of Qianlong, ”Tai Chi Fist“ is of special significance. First, the source of the test Mr. Li Shirong that the stem of the boxing is the son of Chen Genyun Chen Yanxi pass Xuzhan Ao, Xu Chuan Tang Shilin, Tang Chuan Yao Jiang. The basis for its test is ”Tai Chi Chuan“ in the ”Tai Chi stream source “ chapter: ”Wang Zongyue number to Henan Jiangfa, Chen Chang