B.威廉斯在其论文《马克洛普罗事件:对永生之厌倦的反思》中认为,永生是没有意义的。威廉斯指出死亡与有死是不同的,若永生则厌倦;只有满足同一性与吸引力两个条件,永生才不会无聊。尽管威廉斯的理论遭到一些学者的反驳,但本文通过分析得出,威廉斯的这一理论是深刻而富有洞见的。当然他的理论也不是无懈可击的,其同一性条件太严又太宽,但无论如何也不影响永生导致无聊的判断,因为破除对永生的期待,才可让有限的生命更有意义。 B. Williams, in his essay “The Marklopro Incident: The Tired Reflection of Eternal Life,” holds that there is no point in eternal life. Williams pointed out that death and death are different, and if eternal life is tired, eternal life will not be boring only if both conditions of identity and attraction are satisfied. Although Williams’s theory has been rebutted by some scholars, this article analyzes through analysis that Williams’s theory is profound and insightful. Of course, his theory is not flawless. His conditions of identity are too strict and too broad, but in no case does his life affect boring judgments. Only by eliminating the expectation of eternal life can limited life be more meaningful.