论文部分内容阅读
目的观察高压氧佐治毛细支气管炎的临床疗效。方法按照随机对照原则选取86例2011年12月至2012年12月来我院住院治疗的支气管炎患儿作为研究对象,分为传统对照组与高压氧组各43例。传统对照组采用一般治疗及一般护理,高压氧组在一般治疗的基础上配合高压氧治疗,并采取精细护理,观察2组患儿的临床疗效。结果传统对照组显效15例,有效10例,无效18例,总有效率58.14%;高压氧组显效35例,有效8例,总有效率100.00%。2组总有效率比较,差异有统计意义(P<0.05),表明高压氧组疗效显著优于传统对照组。2组治疗后感染、咳嗽、喘憋等临床症状均显著缓解,与同组治疗前比较,差异有统计意义(P<0.05),但高压氧组缓解更为显著,差异有统计意义(P<0.05)。结论高压氧佐治毛细支气管炎疗效确切,且无明显不良反应,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on bronchiolitis. Methods According to the principle of randomized control, 86 children with bronchitis hospitalized in our hospital from December 2011 to December 2012 were selected as the study object and divided into three groups: control group and hyperbaric oxygen group, 43 cases each. The traditional control group used general treatment and general nursing. Hyperbaric oxygen group was treated with hyperbaric oxygen on the basis of general treatment, and meticulous care was used to observe the clinical effect of the two groups of children. Results In the control group, 15 cases were markedly effective, 10 cases were effective, 18 cases were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 58.14%. Hyperbaric oxygen group was markedly effective in 35 cases, effective in 8 cases and total effective rate was 100.00%. The total effective rate in the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05), indicating that hyperbaric oxygen group was significantly better than the traditional control group. After treatment, the clinical symptoms such as infection, cough and wheezing were significantly relieved in both groups, which were significantly different from those before treatment in the same group (P <0.05), but the relief in hyperbaric oxygen group was more significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Hyperbaric oxygen treatment of bronchiolitis is effective, and no obvious adverse reactions, it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.