论文部分内容阅读
目的对阴道B超与腹部B超诊断异位妊娠的价值进行比较,为临床诊断提供参考。方法选取我院2011年1月——2011年12月间收治的60例异位妊娠患者,所有患者均经手术或者病理检查得到确诊。根据术前B超检查方式的不同,分为观察组和对照组,每组患者各30例。观察组患者行经阴道B超检查,对照组行经腹部B超检查,比较两组不同B超检查方式诊断异位妊娠的准确率。结果观察组诊断异位妊娠的准确率为96.67%(29/30),对照组诊断异位妊娠的准确率为80%(24/30),观察组与对照组比较,P<0.05具有显著性差异,有统计学意义。结论阴道B超诊断异位妊娠的价值比腹部B超诊断异位妊娠的价值高,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the diagnostic value of vaginal ultrasonography and abdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy and provide reference for clinical diagnosis. Methods Sixty cases of ectopic pregnancy were selected from January 2011 to December 2011 in our hospital. All patients were confirmed by operation or pathological examination. According to the different preoperative B-mode examination, divided into observation group and control group, each group of 30 patients. The patients in the observation group underwent transvaginal ultrasonography and the control group underwent abdominal ultrasonography. The accuracy of diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy by two different B-mode ultrasound examinations was compared. Results The accuracy rate of ectopic pregnancy was 96.67% (29/30) in observation group and 80% (24/30) in control group, P <0.05 was significant between observation group and control group The difference was statistically significant. Conclusions The diagnostic value of vaginal ultrasound in ectopic pregnancy is higher than that of abdominal ultrasound diagnosis in ectopic pregnancy, which is worthy of clinical promotion.