论文部分内容阅读
对“上有政策,下有对策”这一命题之真伪,不同人的认识和态度大相径庭。有的认为这是干扰中央(或上级)的布置,对上阳奉阴违、甚至分庭抗礼,是丧失党性原则和立场的大逆不道与犯上作乱行为,是“令不行,禁不止”、酿成社会混乱无序与失衡的祸根,因而是极端错误与有害的;有的则不然,他们根据对策论与现代经济学的基本原理并从客观现实的实证出发,认为“上有政策,下有对策”就对了,从理论和实践两个方面都充分肯定这一命题的正确性;有的人嘴上不说,实际这样干,而且从中尝到了甜头,得到了实惠,更坚定了这一命题的客观真理性;愈益增多的人则仔细观察、分析对比、悄悄仿效、试着“上有政策、下有对策”;还有相当一部分人在这一问题上感到盲然、无所适从。如此等等。
The authenticity of the proposition that “there are policies, there are countermeasures”, different people’s understanding and attitude are very different. Some people think that this is a disruption to the arrangement of the Central Government (or the superior). It is “dissuading the government from acting as a deterrent” and causing chaos in the society as a result of disobeying Shangyou’s lawsuits and even taking a rivalry. It is an outrage and a guilty act of disregard for party principles and positions. They are extremely wrong and harmful; others are not, according to the basic theory of countermeasure theory and modern economics and from the objective reality of the evidence, they think that “there is policy, there are countermeasures” is right, The correctness of this proposition is fully affirmed both in theory and in practice. Some people do not say anything in the mouth, but actually they do it, and they have tasted the sweetness, obtained the benefits and strengthened the objective truth of the proposition. More and more people are careful observation, analysis and comparison, quietly follow the example, try “there are policies, there are countermeasures”; there are a considerable number of people feel blind on this issue, know what to do. And so on.