论文部分内容阅读
本文所论述的than／as比较分句限定在就同一属性比较的范围内，这种分句中的省略可分为任选（Optional）和必须（Okligatory）两类。实际语言中，此类分句呈现出纷繁复杂的表层形式是两种省略交错运用的结果。任选省可以复原，必须省无还原性。两种省略均可导致表层主语的空缺，前者可以填补，后者无法补充。由必须省所形成的主语空缺只是这种省略造成的多种句法空位中的一种，在这种情况下任意断定it为省去的主语或强拉than／as作关系代词充任主语都是不必要、也是不科学的。只有综观必须省的全貌，概括出比较分句中表被比属性（含数量）的词语不可复现的规律，才揭示了这一句法现象的实质，确保了对同一句型中的than／as词性分析的一致性。
The than / as comparison clauses discussed in this paper are limited to the comparison of the same attribute. The abbreviations in this clause can be divided into two categories: Optional and Okligatory. In the actual language, such clauses present complex and superficial forms as the result of the two omissions of interleaving. Optional provinces can be restored, there must be no reduction of the province. Two kinds of omission can lead to the vacancy of the surface subject, the former can fill, the latter can not be added. The vacancy of the subject formed by the necessity of the province is only one of many syntactic vacancies caused by such omission, in which case it is arbitrarily asserted that it is omitted from the subject or strongly predicated as a dependent pronoun Necessary and unscientific. Only by reviewing the whole picture of the province that must be in place and outlining the law of non-recoverability of the words whose attributes are compared (including the number) in the comparative clauses reveals the essence of this syntactic phenomenon and ensures that the ratio of than / as The consistency of part of speech analysis.