论文部分内容阅读
民法典编纂是一场关涉整个法律制度体系的重要事件,但这新一轮启动的立法运动,却没有引发如之前物权法制定中出现的广泛讨论现象。正如文章作者所忧虑的,极力希望在历史上“立言”留名的民法学者,几乎垄断了整个民法典的制定过程。而如果缺乏足够的国际比较、未来前瞻与历史文明的担当意识,中国民法学者如何来承担这一历史重任?
The compilation of civil code was a major issue concerning the legal system as a whole. However, this new round of legislative campaign did not trigger the extensive discussion that emerged from the formulation of property law as before. Just as the author of the article worries, the civil law scholar who strongly hopes that the “Li Yan” name has been left in history has almost monopolized the entire civil code making process. However, if there is not enough international comparisons, future perspectives and awareness of historical civilization, how can Chinese civil law scholars shoulder the historic responsibility?