论文部分内容阅读
1.《英雄》背影下的批评与反批评对《英雄》的批评,从对影片本身的批评(形式大于内容),逐步升级到对影片宣传(“炒作”)乃至张艺谋个人及其素质的批评(“面对批评的愤怒”)。北京电影学院黄式宪认为,“媒体不可滥用否定权”,倘若离开中国电影“一盘棋”的这个全局,孤立并且情绪化地就《英雄》来说长道短,显然有失公允。仅就张艺谋推进中国电影产业化、“救世”、“跨界”这一创意及其操作性层面而言,《英雄》在中国电影这盘“棋”上的“开路”意义,显然是积极的。《南方周末》报发表《听听,是谁在说话》中说:很少有人怀疑过我们国内影评界的水平,这可能与我们网络上随处可见的一片热闹的影评盛世景象有关。过去的一年,虽然这种泡沫式的热闹仍旧继续,但我们的评论却似乎越来越远离电影本身。
1. Criticism and counter-criticism under the shadow of “hero” Criticism of “hero” gradually escalated from the criticism of the film itself (in the form of content) to the criticism of the film propaganda (“hype”) and even the individual and quality of Zhang Yimou “Face criticism of anger”). Huang Xixian of the Beijing Film Academy believes that “the media can not abuse the right of denying”. Obviously it is unfair to leave this global, isolated and emotionally long “hero” of the Chinese film “a game of chess.” The “open” meaning of “hero” on the “chess” of Chinese film is clearly positive only for the creative and operational aspects of Zhang Yimou’s efforts to promote China’s film industry, “salvation” and “cross-border” . Southern Weekend, published in “Listen, Who is talking,” said: "Few people have doubts about the level of our domestic film and television critics, which may be related to the thriving cinema and movie world we see on our network. In the past year, while this bubble-like hilarious still continues, our comments seem to be moving away from the film itself.