论文部分内容阅读
私法的发展面临着新的困境:一方面,传统私法因其僵硬的概念和僵化的体系,难以满足社会的需要;另一方面,诉诸正义、衡平、理性和良知等观念的主张赋予法官过大的自由裁决权,从而突破了法律的限制。为此,本文提倡使用“动态构造+弹性规范”即探究法律规范本身及其构成要素的方法来克服这一难题:在损害赔偿法领域,应当放弃试图确立绝对效力的法律原则的解决方案,承认责任源于多个要素或动态力量的相互作用即特殊结合和强度,如果某要素强度特殊,它自身可能足以使责任成立;在合同法领域,尤其是在合同效力的认定上,应当将合同诚信原则、当事人利益的保护、不公平获利情况、当事人的过错行为纳入考虑;在不当得利领域,需要考虑的是:得利的观念和错误、胁迫、欺诈及其他相似力量的相互作用。因此,动态体系论可能会增加法官的职责,但以弹性方式所作的决定可以为制定法提供更为牢固的支持。
The development of private law is facing a new predicament: on the one hand, traditional private law can not meet the needs of the society because of its rigid concept and its rigid system; on the other hand, the idea of resorting to such concepts as justice, equity, reason and conscience gives the judge Big discretionary power, thus breaking the legal restrictions. To this end, this article advocates the use of the “dynamic constructs + flexible specifications” to explore the legal norms and their components to overcome this dilemma: in the area of damages law, the solution to the legal principle of seeking to establish absolute validity should be abandoned , Recognizing that responsibility stems from the interaction and interaction between multiple elements or dynamic forces, that is, the special combination and intensity. If an element is of special intensity, it may be sufficient for the liability to be established; in the field of contract law, especially in determining the validity of a contract, The principle of good faith in contracts, the principle of good faith in contracts, the protection of the interests of the parties concerned, the unfair profits and the wrongdoings of the parties. In the field of unjust enrichment, the following must be considered: the concept of profit-taking and the interaction of coercion, fraud and other similar forces . As a result, dynamic systems theory may increase the role of judges, but a flexible decision can provide even stronger support for statutory law.