论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较硫酸沙丁胺醇与布地奈德混悬液的不同氧流量雾化吸入治疗婴幼儿喘息的疗效。方法:将78例喘息婴幼儿患者分成3组,即A组(氧流量为3 L/min)、B组(氧流量为5 L/min)、C组(氧流量为8 L/min),每组26例,分别采用氧气雾化吸入以驱动硫酸沙丁胺醇与布地奈德混悬液的治疗;观察喘息婴幼儿患者雾化吸入前、后其症状改善的情况,并做统计学分析。结果:3组不同氧流量驱动雾化吸入治疗,其雾化时间较适中,雾化效果以B组为好;在临床疗效方面B组的总有效率为92.31%与A组总有效率为69.23%比较,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而与C组比较,其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:婴幼儿喘息患者在进行雾化吸入时氧流量在5L/min能达到最佳雾化效果,是一种有效的雾化吸入方式,值得推广和应用。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of aerosol inhalation with salbutamol sulfate and budesonide suspension in the treatment of infantile asthma. Methods: A total of 78 asthmatic infants and young children were divided into three groups: group A (oxygen flow 3 L / min), group B (oxygen flow 5 L / min), group C (oxygen flow 8 L / min) In each group, 26 patients were treated with aerosol inhalation to drive the administration of salbutamol sulfate and budesonide respectively. The symptoms of infantile infantile before and after aerosol inhalation were observed and analyzed statistically. Results: The atomization time of three groups with different oxygen flux driven nebulization was moderate, and the atomization effect was better in group B. The total effective rate of group B was 92.31% and the total effective rate of group A was 69.23 %, Respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05), while there was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Infant asthma sufferers can achieve the best atomization effect when the oxygen flux is 5L / min. It is an effective atomization inhalation method, which is worth popularizing and applying.