论文部分内容阅读
虽然目前学界提出的“混淆标准”与“显著性标准”均可在一定程度上为商标侵权的认定提供理论支撑,但却均存在对商标权人的利益保护不够周延的问题。鉴于商标功能是商标赖以存在的基础,对商标权利益边界的划定应当建立在对商标功能进行整体把握的基础上。为此,我国应在商标法中设置有关商标侵权认定的一般性条款,并在其中突显对商标功能的维护。
Although the “confusion standard” and “significant standard” proposed by academia can both provide theoretical support for the identification of trademark infringement to a certain extent, they all have the problem of the prolonged protection of the interests of trademark holders. In view of the fact that the trademark function is the basis of existence of the trademark, the demarcation of the boundary of the interest of trademark rights should be based on the overall grasping of the trademark function. To this end, our country should set general provisions on the determination of trademark infringement in the Trademark Law, and highlight the protection of the trademark function.