自马国翰卒后至今,有关其著述的真伪与流传等问题依然存在,笔者爬梳其传世作品,分别考订马国翰家世生平及其辑佚书活动始末、《玉函山房辑佚书》的四种版本并其他著述的刊刻流传。认为该书有所辑佚书篇目多、篇目前多有序录、注明利用前贤成果、并加补缀校勘、佚文编排审慎、力求“复原”等特点。围绕历史上马国翰辑佚书攘窃章宗源成果说重加考述,进一步否定该说,并以王仁俊的辑佚说明马国翰辑佚书的深远影响。 Since the death of Maltese Han, there are still some problems about the authenticity and spread of his writings. The author climbed up his handed down works, and then took a test of the life of Ma Guohan and his series of lost books. The four editions The circulation of other writings spread. The author thinks there are many books in this book, and there are many prefaces in the book at present, which indicate the use of the predecessors’ results and the addition of collation, the careful planning of lost articles, and the pursuit of “recovery” and so on. On the history of the history of John Book of Records stolen Zhang Zongyuan said repeated test, further denying the said, and Wang Renjun’s collection of lectures to explain the far-reaching impact of Ma Guo-Han’s lost books.