论文部分内容阅读
本文对1990～1994年经手法扩张宫颈处理的113例产妇(观察组)及同期内未经手法扩张宫颈处理的113例产妇(对照组)进行了产程观察,并对宫颈水肿、分娩方式、产后出血、新生儿情况进行分析比较。两组条件相同,均为初产妇、头位,无头盆不称和其它合并症。 观察组113例产妇无1例出现宫颈水肿,宫口3～5cm至开全时间最短为28min,最长90min。而对照组113例中出现了42例不同程度的宫颈水肿,宫口开大时间明显长于观察组。 观察组113例产妇中,在扩张宫口时发现11例胎头位置异常,5例矫正成功。自然分娩105例,平均第二产程为38±9.5min。
In this paper, 113 maternal women (observation group) who underwent cervical dilatation by hand during 1990 to 1994 and 113 maternal women who underwent untyped cervical dilation during the same period (control group) were enrolled in this study. The etiology of cervical edema, mode of delivery, Bleeding, neonatal situation analysis and comparison. The two groups of conditions are the same, all primipara, head position, headless basin and other complications. The observation group 113 cases of maternal no case of cervical edema, cervix 3 ~ 5cm to open the shortest duration of 28min, the longest 90min. In the control group, there were 42 cases of cervical edema in 113 cases, and the open time of cervix was longer than that of the observation group. Among 113 maternal women in the observation group, 11 cases of abnormal fetal head position were found during the dilation of cervix, and 5 cases were corrected successfully. 105 cases of natural childbirth, the average second stage of labor was 38 ± 9.5min.