论文部分内容阅读
年仅31岁的黄德才为帮邻居抓小偷,因体力不支而牺牲了年轻的生命。丈夫牺牲后,抚养年仅2岁的儿子和7 岁的女儿及赡养年老多病的公婆的重担都落在了其妻肖光珍的身上。为了生活,这个家欠下了1万多元的债务,受益者陈礼林却只同意补偿几千元,于是肖光珍一纸诉状将陈礼林推上了被告席。受益者觉得本身被盗的物品价值也不高,并且不是受害者追回来的,不应承担责任。而受害者牺牲的可是一条鲜活的生命,双方各有说法。至2004年12月上旬,此案终于有了眉目,那么受益者是否应该对牺牲的英雄进行赔偿?这起特殊的案件又是如何定论的呢?
Only 31-year-old Huang Tak was arrested for helping his neighbors thieves, due to physical inactivity at the expense of young life. After her husband’s sacrifice, the burden of raising her 2-year-old son and her 7-year-old daughter and supporting her old and sick husband-in-law all fell on her wife, Xiao Guangzhen. In order to live, the family owed more than 10,000 yuan of debt, the beneficiary Chen Lailin only agreed to compensate a few thousand dollars, so Xiao Guangzhen a paper petition Chen Lailin pushed the dock. The beneficiaries feel that the value of the stolen items is not high and they are not recovered by the victims and should not be held responsible. But the victims sacrifice but a vivid life, both sides have their own statement. By the first ten days of December 2004, the case was finally brought to light, so should the beneficiaries make compensation for the sacrificed heroes? How can this particular case be decided?