《必须严肃批判大毒草影片〈红高粱〉》一文被西影厂推荐给了《电影评介》,这不能不说是对几千年来形成的中国式的保守落后遗风的一种无奈和讥讽。《必》文的几位署名者痛心疾首地断喝:打倒犯有『政治错误的黑片』。文中历数了影片《红高粱》中『原始、野蛮、愚蠢、落后、剥人皮』等诸条罪行,怒斥吴天明、张艺谋『骨头奇轻』,又讲到上海人大几位代表要求严肃批判大毒草,等等。似乎果真『全国朝野一片责难之声』。看罢这篇小文。我感到悲哀,悲哀曾经险使中国文化濒于毁灭的『文化大革命』的庸俗文艺评论方式到今天竟然还有市场。『仁者见仁,智者见智』,你可以从影片中看到民族精魂之所在,我也可以从中看到民性之劣陋。然而,『批评家要有广阔的生活知识,掌握时代的脉搏,不能只住在高楼大厦里,空谈高论、指指点点』(丁玲语),不能打棍子,不能让帽子横飞。电影评论的目的在于使观众能认 It must be said that it is a helpless and sarcasm of the conservative Chinese legacy that has been formed over the past few thousand years. “The article” Red Sorghum “must be severely criticized. Several signatories of the ”must“ disgustedly dismissed: ”black-out of political mistakes“. The article cites various crimes such as ”primitiveness, brutality, stupidity, backwardness and dehumanization“ in the movie ”Red Sorghum“, annoying Wu Tianming and Zhang Yimou for ”bony surprises“ and also mentioned that several deputies from Shanghai NPC demanded serious criticism Poisonous weeds, and more. Seems to be really ”a nationwide cynical voice.“ Watch this small article. I am saddened by the tragedy of the vulgar literary criticism of the ”Cultural Revolution“ that once threatened to destroy Chinese culture. Today there is still a market there. ”Benevolence sees benevolence, Wise men see wisdom,“ you can see where the national spirit is from the film, and I can also see the inferiority of the people. However, ”Critics must have a vast knowledge of life and grasp the pulse of the times. They should not just live in skyscrapers. They should not talk too much about pointing at something" (Ding Ling). They can not stick and can not let their hats fly away. The purpose of movie reviews is to make the audience recognize