论文部分内容阅读
将维稳的关口前移,即在决策事项出台前进行社会稳定风险评估(以下简称“稳评”)成为维稳发展的明确方向,旨在从源头上化解社会矛盾,达到维护稳定的目的。我国多地在积极推行稳评措施,但实践的效果参差不齐。以H市卫生系统的绩效工资改革作为研究对象,运用扎根理论方法分析其稳评实践。结果发现,一方面,出台前经过稳评后的绩效工资改革在实施中出现新的影响社会稳定的风险,有必要再次进行稳评才有可能为该改革政策的稳定实施“保驾护航”;另一方面,公共政策实施中的稳评在利益主体、风险因素、公众参与等方面都与出台前的稳评存在较大差异。因此,稳评不但有必要贯穿于政策出台和实施的每个阶段中,而且与出台前的稳评相比,政策实施中的稳评更应该实现评估主体多元化、评估内容复杂化、风险沟通持续化,以及政策信息的公开化。
The stability of the key move forward, that is, the introduction of decision-making matters before the introduction of social stability risk assessment (hereinafter referred to as “steady assessment”) has become a clear direction for the maintenance of stability and development, aimed at resolving social conflicts from the source to achieve the purpose of maintaining stability. Many countries in our country actively promote steady assessment measures, but the effect of practice is uneven. H market health system performance wage reform as the research object, the use of grounded theory analysis of its steady practice. The results showed that on the one hand, there was a new risk of social stability in the implementation of the performance-based wage reform after the steady assessment before the introduction of the reform. It is necessary to carry out the steady assessment again before it is possible to ensure the stable implementation of the reform policy. On the other hand, the steady assessment of the implementation of public policies has great discrepancies with the steady assessment before the introduction of stakeholders, risk factors and public participation. Therefore, it is not only necessary for steady assessment to run through every stage of the introduction and implementation of policies, but also to ensure the diversification of assessment subjects, complicated assessment contents and risk communication compared with the steady assessment before the introduction of policies Continuous, as well as the openness of policy information.