论文部分内容阅读
2013年11月16—17日,由中国社会科学院近代史研究所《抗日战争研究》编辑部主办,中国社会科学出版社协办的“东亚秩序与近代中国”国际学术讨论会在京召开。来自中日韩三国的30余位专家学者参加了本次会议,与会专家学者围绕册封—朝贡关系就以下诸问题展开了热烈讨论。一、理论实践之间。中国社会科学院哲学研究所赵汀阳研究员认为,朝贡体系是一个误导性的概念,所谓朝贡关系充其量只是中国古代对外关系的一部分。中国边疆史地研究中心李大龙研究员认为,中国历代王朝构建的藩属体制是朝贡关系存在的前提,而朝贡只是维持这一体制运转的
From November 16 to November 17, 2013, the “East Asia Order and Modern China” international symposium was held in Beijing, co-organized by the Editorial Department of “Anti-Japanese War Studies” of the Institute of Modern History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and co-organized by China Social Sciences Publishing House. More than 30 experts and scholars from China, Japan and South Korea participated in the conference. Experts and scholars attending the symposium held heated discussions on the following issues: the tributary relations. First, between theoretical practice. Zhao Tingyang, a researcher at the Institute of Philosophy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, believes that the tributary system is a misleading concept. The so-called tributary relationship is only a part of ancient Chinese foreign relations. Researcher Li Dalong of China’s Borderland Historical and Cultural Studies Research Center believes that the vassal system established by the dynasties of China was a prerequisite for the existence of the tributary relationship while the tribute only maintained the operation of the system