目的:在大学生群体中对思维压抑量表(White Bear Suppression Inventory,WBSI)进行修订并考察其信效度。方法:采用方便取样方法,对样本一的125名大学生施测WBSI及贝克抑郁问卷,以检验该量表的效度,并随机选取其中33名学生,在初测4周后进行了重测;对样本二的383名大学生施测WBSI、宾州忧虑问卷、事件影响量表-修订版及想法行为混淆量表。对样本三的334名大学生施测WBSI、帕多瓦量表、特质焦虑问卷及多元个人传统性量表-宿命迷信分量表。结果:对样本一的探索性因素分析获得WBSI的3个因素(闯入性思维、思维压抑和转移注意),3个因素可解释总变异的52.4%;对样本二和样本三的验证性因素分析显示,三因素模型拟合最好(χ2/df=3.45,CFI=0.91,TLI=0.89,RMSEA=0.07,SRMR=0.06)。WBSI总分的内部一致性系数为0.87,重测信度为0.59;3个因素的内部一致性系数分别为0.83、0.66和0.70。女性WBSI得分均显著高于男性。效标效度分析表明WBSI与抑郁(r=0.29)、特质焦虑(r=0.42)、创伤后应激障碍症状(r=0.42)、强迫症状(r=0.30)及广泛性焦虑症状(r=0.44)呈显著正相关。本研究还探索了迷信在OCD症状的发展维持中的作用,结果支持迷信导致了思维压抑从而导致了OCD症状(χ2/df=5.04,CFI=0.88,TLI=0.82,RMSEA=0.11,SRMR=0.08)。结论:思维压抑量表的中文修订版具有良好的信效度。 Objective: To revise and examine the reliability and validity of White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI) among college students. Methods: A sample of 125 undergraduates was tested by WBAS and Baker ’s depression questionnaire to test the validity of the questionnaire. 33 students were selected randomly and retested after 4 weeks. A sample of 383 college students in sample 2 was administered the WBSI, the Pennsylvania Worries Questionnaire, the Incident Impact Scale - Revised and the Confusion of Ideas Behavior. Three sample of 334 college students administered WBSI, Padua Scale, Trait Anxiety Questionnaire and Multivariate Individual Trait Scale - Fetal Superstition Scale. Results: Exploratory factor analysis of sample 1 obtained three factors of WBSI (intruding thinking, thinking depression and metastasis attention), three factors explained 52.4% of total variation, and the confirmatory factor of sample two and sample three Analysis showed that the three-factor model fits best (χ2 / df = 3.45, CFI = 0.91, TLI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.06). The internal consistency coefficient of the WBSI score was 0.87 and the test-retest reliability was 0.59. The internal consistency coefficients of the three factors were 0.83, 0.66 and 0.70 respectively. Female WBSI scores were significantly higher than men. The validity of WBSI showed that WBSI was associated with depression (r = 0.29), trait anxiety (r = 0.42), posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (r = 0.42), obsessive compulsive symptoms (r = 0.30) and generalized anxiety symptoms 0.44) was significantly positive correlation. This study also explored the role of superstition in the development and maintenance of OCD symptoms. As a result, support for superstition led to depression in thinking resulting in OCD symptoms (χ2 / df = 5.04, CFI = 0.88, TLI = 0.82, RMSEA = 0.11, SRMR = ). Conclusion: The Chinese version of Mental Retarded Scale has good reliability and validity.