论文部分内容阅读
毛泽东对总路线“实质”的解释 ,并不意味背离工业化的“主体”地位 ,三大改造始终是围绕工业化这个“主体”展开的 ;他后来对“过渡时期”的界定 ,即“从资本主义到社会主义的过渡” ,不是从社会形态角度而是从所有制改造的角度提出的问题 ,与他强调总路线的实质就是改造所有制的观点相一致 ;毛泽东对资本主义经济成分的积极作用不是没有认识 ,但同时认为与其在政治思想方面带来的消极影响相比是得不偿失 ,故而提出“使资本主义在中国绝种”。
Mao Zedong’s interpretation of the “essence” of the general line does not mean deviating from the “subject” status of industrialization. The three major reforms have always centered on the “subject” of industrialization. Later, he defined the definition of “transition period” as “from capitalism to Socialist Transition ”is not a question raised from the perspective of social reform but from the perspective of ownership reform. It is consistent with his point of emphasizing that the essence of the general line is to transform ownership. Mao Zedong did not fail to recognize the positive role of the capitalist economic component, At the same time, it is considered worth more than losing the negative impact it brings on political and ideological issues. Therefore, “making capitalism extinct in China” is proposed.