“宋案”后孙中山对袁世凯的态度

来源 :历史研究 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:fyf7228912
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
国内辛亥革命史及民国史的论著,几乎一致认为,1913年3月20日宋教仁被刺后,孙中山已认清了袁世凯妄图消灭国民党革命势力和帝制自为的反动面目,从而竭力主张并一贯坚持起兵讨袁。论者的主要依据,一是孙中山给黄兴的信及后来的回忆文字;二是陈其美给黄兴的书信;三是当事人李书城、周震鳞等人后来的回忆录。最近,笔者查阅辛亥革命时期广州出版的报刊,在《民生日报》(1912年5月创刊)上发现孙中山的两封佚电和半篇谈话佚文,由此而对这一结论产生了不同的看法。为便于阐述拙见,先将孙中山的两封佚电和半篇谈话佚文,整理抄录如下:一、孙中山1913年5月上旬致袁世凯电:“闻公有辞职说。念民国成立以来,由临时而入正式,由干戈而化玉帛,惟公一人。文前次因南北意见,孑身北上,融化感情、畅聆教言,原冀共扶大局。 The domestic Revolution of 1911 and the history of the Republic of China were almost unanimously agreed that after Song Jiaoren’s assassination on March 20, 1913, Sun Yat-sen had realized that Yuan Shikai vainly attempted to eliminate the reactionary Kuomintang revolutionary forces and the self-serving reactionary state of the Kuomintang, Has consistently uprising to discuss Yuan. The main basis for the commentator was Sun Yat-sen’s letter to Huang Hsing and his later memories. The second was Chen Qimei’s letters to Huang Hsing. The third was Li Shucheng and Zhou Zhen-scale’s later memoirs. Recently I read the newspapers and periodicals published in Guangzhou during the Revolution of 1911 and found two separate accounts of Lost and Half Lost Texts of Sun Yat-sen in the Daily Minsheng Daily (May 1912 publication), which led to a different opinion on this conclusion . In order to explain my humble opinion, I first wrote down two lost and half lost articles of Sun Yat-sen and put it in the following transcripts: I. Sun Yat-sen Yuan Shikai’s telegram to Hong Kong in early May 1913: ”Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, Into the formal, from the dry Gehua and Yabo, but the public one .. Man last opinion because of North and South, larvae north to melt feelings, listen to the teachings, the original hope to help the overall situation.
其他文献
我发明的新型文具盒正面有一个显示屏,可以显示不同的图画,你可以根据你的喜好让文具盒显示你喜欢的颜色、画面,外观非常精美。  打开文具盒,里面放着我们常用的文具用品。这个文具盒一共有两层,上层和下层之间是透明的,可以看得见下面的钢笔、铅笔和圆珠笔等。文具盒的一端有一个自动门,两边各有一个按钮。轻轻按一下左边的按钮,一支钢笔便从文具盒的自动门慢慢滑出来,钢笔滑出来的时候墨水总是满满的!原来文具盒里有一