论文部分内容阅读
4月27日,北京市第二中级法院审理了某银行诉某科技公司、某金属公司保理合同纠纷上诉一案。银行诉称,银行与科技公司签订《国内商业发票贴现协议》及《有追索权国内融信达业务申请书》,约定科技公司将其与金属公司购销合同项下的500余万应收账款债权全部转让给银行,并基于应收账款债权总额,向银行申请融资405万。后科技公司和银行将债权转让情况通知了金属公司。应收账款到期后,金属公司先后向银行支付了405万元货款,余款95万余元未
On April 27, Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People’s Court heard the case of a bank suing a science and technology company and a dispute over the factoring contract of a metal company. Banks claimed that banks and technology companies signed the “Domestic Commercial Invoice Discount Agreement” and “Requested domestic financial letter up to business applications,” agreed that the technology companies and metal companies under the contract for the sale of more than 500 million receivables All claims were transferred to the bank, and based on the total debts of accounts receivable, the bank applied for financing 4.05 million. Post technology companies and banks to notify the transfer of claims of metal companies. After the accounts receivable expired, the metal company paid 4.05 million yuan of payment to the bank with the balance of 95 million yuan