论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨一般攻击模型框架下挫折情境、归因方式对青少年内隐、外显攻击性的影响机制。方法:使用多维-多向归因量表筛选出具有内、外归因倾向的青少年各30名作为研究对象。采用2(有挫折、无挫折)×2(内归因、外归因)混合试验设计，并使用挫折情境任务、Buss-Perry攻击性量表、单类内隐联想测验进行研究。使用E-prime 1.0编写SC-IAT的试验程序，使用SPSS 17.0进行描述性统计、双因素方差分析、简单效应分析以及事后检验。结果:挫折情境对个体的外显、内隐攻击性的影响均差异有统计学意义(n F(1，58)＝6.78，n P<0.05，偏n η2＝0.11和n F(1，58)＝17.59，n P<0.01，偏n η2＝0.23)。挫折的情境中被试的外显攻击性[(83.43±15.05)分]和内隐攻击性[(-0.06±0.35)分]高于无挫折的情境中的外显攻击性[(80.54±12.40)分]和内隐攻击性[(-0.33±0.49)分]。挫折情境对不同归因方式被试的外显、内隐攻击性的影响均差异有统计学意义(n F(1，58)＝4.90，n P<0.05，偏n η2＝0.08；n F(1，58)＝8.68，n P<0.01，偏n η2＝0.13)。挫折情境对内归因被试(n D0)的内隐攻击性有较大影响[有挫折：(0.07±0.35)分；无挫折：(-0.40±0.45)分]。n 结论:挫折情境对青少年的外显、内隐性攻击的影响受到归因方式的调节，一般攻击模型适用于解释外显攻击性和内隐攻击性。“,”Objective:To explore the influence mechanism of frustration situation and attribution style on adolescents\' implicit and explicit aggression under the framework of general aggression model.Methods:Using the multi-dimensional attribution scale, thirty adolescents with internal attribution and thirty with external attribution tendencies were selected as research objects.A mixed experimental design of 2(frustration n vs no frustration) × 2(internal attribution n vs external attribution)was adopted.And the frustration situation task, Buss-Perry aggressive questionnaire and single category implicit association test were used for the research.The experimental program of SC-IAT was rendered with E-prime 1.0.SPSS 17.0 software was used for descriptive statistics, double facter variance analysis, simple effect analysis and post-test.n Results:The effects of frustration situation on individuals\' explicit and implicit aggression were statistically significant (n F(1, 58)=6.78, n P<0.05,n η2 = 0.11 and n F(1, 58)= 17.59, n P<0.01,n η2 = 0.23). The explicit aggression (83.43±15.05) and implicit aggression (-0.06±0.35) in the situation of frustration were higher than those in the condition of no frustration (80.54±12.40) and implicit aggression (-0.33±0.49). The effects of frustration situation on explicit and implicit aggression of subjects with different attribution styles were statistically significant (n F(1, 58)=4.90, n P<0.05,n η2 = 0.08 and n F(1, 58)= 8.68, n P<0.01,n η2 =0.13). The frustration situation had a great influence on explicit aggression of the subjects with internal attribution (n D0) (frustration: (0.07±0.35), no frustration: (-0.40±0.45)).n Conclusion:Frustration situation influences explicit and implicit aggression of adolescents, and attribution style plays a moderating role in it.Both explicit aggression and implicit aggression can be explained by the general aggression model.