论文部分内容阅读
作为一种价值判断,利益衡量普遍存在于司法过程之中。指导性案例6号对如何在实践中使用利益衡量提供了范例。具体来说,法律所赋予的自由裁量权为利益衡量提供了存在的制度空间,而法律利益衡量的结果也需要多种理由来证成。其中,实体证成理由需要在相同本质的利益之间进行比较,而双方当事人充分参与的司法过程则提供了程序上的证成理由。以上这些理由不仅能够证成在个案中进行利益衡量的结果,还能够推动整个司法过程质量的提升,具有十分重要的实践意义。
As a kind of value judgments, the measurement of interests prevails in the judicial process. Guiding Case 6 provides an example of how to use the measurement of benefits in practice. Specifically, the discretion given by law provides the institutional space for the measurement of interests, and the outcome of the measurement of legal interests also needs a variety of reasons to prove it. Among them, the reasons for the substantive certification need to be compared between the interests of the same nature, and the full participation of the parties involved in the judicial process provides procedural reasons for the evidence. These reasons not only prove the result of measuring interests in individual cases, but also promote the quality of the entire judicial process, which is of great practical significance.