论文部分内容阅读
随着节能工作的深入开展,分析逐渐成为热门话题,本刊陆续收到一些有关分析方面的稿件。人们通常把开展得较早的能量平衡视为用能分析的“初级阶段”,而把开展分析工作看作用能分析的纵深发展,这当然无可非议。但有的文章中认为以热力学第一定律为基础的能量平衡是不够科学的,只有以热力学第二定律为基础的分析才是科学的、高水平的。这种提法似欠妥当。基于这种认识,往往导致不问是否真有必要、不管究竟有无实用意义,都去为分析而分析,酿成一阵分析热,我们认为,
With the deepening of energy conservation work, the analysis has gradually become a hot topic. The journal has received a number of manuscripts related to analysis. People usually regard the energy balance developed earlier as the “primary stage” of energy analysis, and it is of course unquestionable to carry out the analysis work to see the depth of development of the role analysis. However, in some articles, it is considered that the energy balance based on the first law of thermodynamics is not scientific enough, and only the analysis based on the second law of thermodynamics is scientific and high-level. This formulation seems inappropriate. Based on this kind of understanding, it often leads to whether or not it is really necessary or whether or not it is practically useful. It analyzes and analyzes it. It leads to an analysis of heat. We believe that