论文部分内容阅读
在寻求裁判合理性的诸多方法中,修辞具有独特的优势。它不仅注意到了人在裁判活动中的主体性作用,还通过扩展理性的边界增强了司法裁判的实践面向。此外,它还为司法价值判断提供了一套具体的技术和方案。然而,修辞方法也存在着一定的局限。一方面,它在解决司法确定性问题上存在不足,另一方面,现有的修辞理论和方案在实践中也难于保证裁判合理性的实现。修辞只能在与其他方法的互补作用中才能获得恰当的方法论地位。
Rhetoric has unique advantages in many ways of seeking refereeing rationality. It not only noticed the subjective role of human in refereeing activities, but also strengthened the practice orientation of judicial adjudication by extending the rational boundary. In addition, it provides a specific set of techniques and programs for judicial value judgments. However, rhetorical methods also have some limitations. On the one hand, it has some deficiencies in resolving the problem of judicial certainty. On the other hand, it is difficult for the existing rhetorical theories and programs to guarantee the reasonableness of referees in practice. Rhetoric can only gain an appropriate methodological position in its complementarity with other approaches.