《新闻战线》自发行以来,我是期期看的。有很多好文章使我受益非浅。其中“读者论坛”办得很好,文章短小,小中见大,切中时弊,颇有启发。但新出版的第三期禾子同志的《不科学的科学报道》一文应在例外,看过之后,实在忍俊不禁。因贵刊读者多在新闻界,所以拟一短文,讲点意见。其一,禾子同志开首云:十分荒唐的耳朵认字奇闻,经“有的报纸明确指出用耳认字违反科学之后,还有不少人不以为然”。原因何在呢?“一个重要的原因是某些报纸尤其是有些科技报作了不科学的报道。”奇怪的是禾子同志为什么不琢磨一下,科技报登过之后,至今(以北京一般读者所见)已有五家全国性报刊(算贵刊则六家)发表十篇(可见此事之大)文章指出反科学了。“笃信不疑”、“不以为然”者仍“不少”,同样“白纸黑字”难道地方科技报威力 Since the release of the “news front”, I have read the passage. There are many good articles that I benefited from. Among them, “Reader Forum” did a very good job, short articles, small to big, cut shortcomings, quite inspired. However, the article entitled “Unscientific Scientific Reporting” of the newly-published Third Comrade Wo Zi should be made an exception. After reading it, I can not help but be patient. Because your readers mostly in the press, it is proposed an essay to talk about. First, comrade Woo commented on the cloud: very absurd ear writing anecdote, after “some newspapers clearly pointed out that the use of ear recognition violates science, there are still many people disagree.” Why? “One important reason is that some newspapers, especially some science and technology newspapers, make unscientific reports.” What is strange is why Comrade Woo did not think about it. Since the publication of the science and technology newspaper, See) There are already ten national papers published in five national newspapers (counting six for your edition), pointing out anti-science. “Believe it or not”, “disagree” who are still “a lot”, the same “black and white” Is the power of local science and technology newspaper