论文部分内容阅读
在中国的政党研究领域,治理或善治理论的引入多少显得有些寂寥。治理所导致的失败、善治的意识形态色彩、治理结构与政党制度特征上的冲突以及治理社会基础的缺失,这四个方面影响了治理理论与中国政党政治研究的关联。实质上,治理并不必然导致失败,治理理论可在工具层面上运用,它并不与意识形态有内在的关联;治理结构与政党制度具有内在的适应性;同时,随着社会主义市场经济的深度拓展,治理所需的社会的主体性力量正在逐渐成长,其社会基础并不缺失。因而,治理理论和中国的政党问题研究具有强相关性。治理或善治理论可以成为中国政党制度理论研究的新的生长点。
In the field of political party research in China, the introduction of the theory of governance or good governance appears somewhat lonely. The failure of governance, the ideology of good governance, the conflict between the governance structure and the characteristics of party system, and the lack of governance of social foundation have affected the relationship between governance theory and Chinese political party politics. In essence, governance does not necessarily lead to failure. Governance theory can be applied at the tool level. It does not have an inherent connection with ideology. Governance structure and party system have inherent adaptability. At the same time, with the socialist market economy The subjective power of the society required for further development and governance is gradually growing, and its social foundation is not missing. Therefore, the theory of governance and the study of China’s political parties have a strong correlation. The theory of governance or good governance can become a new growth point in the study of the theory of the political party system in China.