论文部分内容阅读
情势变更原则与作为民法基本原则的公平原则虽然有相似之处,但在适用上有较大的区别。在司法实践中,应对二者的适用条件和限制有准确的认识和严格的区分案例原告(反诉被告):上海某海运公司被告(反诉原告):上海某装卸服务公司2007年9月26日,原告与被告就码头装卸订立合作协议。其后,为确保世博会期间水上交通安全,上海海事局发布《关于世博会期间上海港水上交通安全管理公告》,自2010年4月1日起至11月30日对黄浦江进行分区分级管控,涉案码头地处周边控制区。2010年4月19日,被告致函原告,称其受管控影响,几乎无法正常经营,欲就世博会
Although there are similarities between the principle of changing circumstances and the principle of fairness as the basic principle of civil law, there is a big difference in their application. In judicial practice, we should have accurate understanding and strict distinction between the applicable conditions and restrictions of the two cases. Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendants): Defendant of a Shipping Company in Shanghai (Counterclaim Plaintiff): Shanghai Unloading Service Company On September 26, 2007, The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a cooperation agreement on terminal handling. Since then, to ensure maritime traffic safety during the World Expo, Shanghai Maritime Safety Administration promulgated the “Notice on the Safety Management of Shanghai Port during the World Expo”, from April 1, 2010 to November 30, 2010, Wharf is located in the surrounding area control. April 19, 2010, the defendant sent a letter to the plaintiff, saying that under the control of the influence of almost impossible to operate normally, for the World Expo