论文部分内容阅读
商朝武丁时的卜辭習惯用语,有“不(?)(?)”三字,这是自从甲骨文字发现以来,聚讼几十年没有解决的问题之一。十多年前闻一多先生考釋这三个字的时候曾经说: “(?)(?)”二字,释者八九家,聚讼数十载,衆说纷纭,事同射覆,不幸而皆未中也。“一多先生逝世以后,又几已十年,这仍然没有解决。我以为解决这两个字的含义,须要注意到几个关键:(一)是两个字中的每一个字的解释必须正确,而合起来后必须成词;否则就某一字而论,或者可以传会,而合起来后也许鑿柄不通。(二)是这两个字的解释必须和卜(?)有关,因为这是兆璺旁边的刻辭,不是一般的记事,必须正确的说明这雨个字的含
Shang dynasty Wu dialect idioms, with ”not (?) (?) “ Three words, which is the Oracle word since the discovery, the lawsuit has not been solved for decades, one of the problems. More than a decade ago, when Mr. Wen Yiduuo examined and explained these three words, he once said: ”(?) (?) “ Cover, unlucky but not in the also. ”After Yaduo’s death, only a few years have passed and this still remains unresolved. I think several key points need to be taken into consideration in resolving the meaning of these two words: (a) the interpretation of each of the two words Must be correct, but must be coined after the word; otherwise in terms of a word, or can pass, and may not work together. (Two) is the interpretation of these two words and BU (?) Because this is the address beside the trumpet, not a general memo, we must correctly explain the word