论文部分内容阅读
目的比较超声引导可视下行无痛人工流产与传统人工流产的优势和临床效果。方法选取2010年1月至2012年1月间在台安县恩良医院接受人工流产的500例妇女,随机分成超导组与传统组,每组250例,其中超导组在超声引导可视下行无痛人工流产,传统组采用普通的人工流产术,比较两组的临床效果。结果镇痛效果方面超导组有效率高于传统组,且在发生流产综合征或者子宫穿孔以及流产不全的几率方面超导组明显低于传统组。结论超声引导可视下行无痛人工流产不仅减轻患者痛苦,而且减少并发症的发生,建议临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the advantages and clinical effects of ultrasound-guided visual painless artificial abortion and traditional induced abortion. Methods A total of 500 women who underwent induced abortion at En Liang Hospital, Taian County from January 2010 to January 2012 were randomly divided into superconducting group (n = 250) and traditional group (n = 250). Ultrasound guided visual descending Painless abortion, the traditional group of ordinary abortion, the clinical effect of the two groups were compared. Results The analgesic effects of the superconducting group was higher than that of the conventional group, and the superconducting group was significantly lower than the traditional group in the incidence of abortion syndrome or uterine perforation and incomplete abortion. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided visual descending painless abortion not only reduce the patient’s pain, but also reduce the incidence of complications, it is recommended clinical application.