投票权价购早已有之,The Schreiber court针对Schreiber v.Carney案例开始对投票权价购予以界定,并改变了完全禁止投票权价购的态度,对于通过Schreiber Court分析的投票权价购持允许态度。美国特拉华州关于投票权价购司法实践变革给各国对于投票权价购的规制提供了经验性参考,结合我国台湾地区对于投票权价购规制的变迁,最初我国禁止投票权价购符合时宜,但是随着证券市场的发展,公司治理机制的完善,新型公司问题的不断出现,允许投票权价购,构建投票权价购的规制机制已经是我国立法所面临的重要课题。 Already, the Schreiber court started to define the voting rights for the Schreiber v. Carney case and changed the attitude of a total ban on the purchase of voting rights. For the purchase price of the voting rights approved by Schreiber Court, attitude. The change of the judicial practice of the voting rights in Delaware has provided an empirical reference for the regulation of the voting rights in all countries. Combined with the change of the regulation of the voting rights in Taiwan of our country, However, with the development of the securities market, the improvement of the corporate governance mechanism, the emergence of new-type companies, the allowance of the right to vote, and the establishment of the regulatory mechanism for the purchase of the right to vote have become an important issue for our country’s legislation.