论文部分内容阅读
随着社会的发展,人们法律意识的提高,越来越多的国人选择在结婚前或者婚姻关系存续期间与另一方签订“忠诚协议”来维护自己的权益,巩固婚姻关系。在我国现行的法律中,对“忠诚协议”效力认定无统一的标准,这使法院在审理类似案件中无法可依,从而导致同案不同判。笔者以山东省和河北省法院两例裁判案件为例,总结出对“忠诚协议”效力持不同意见学说的观点,结合对“忠诚协议”的学理探讨,对今后完善认定“忠诚协议”效力的法律及制度构建提出了自己的建议。
With the development of society and the improvement of people’s legal awareness, more and more Chinese choose to sign “loyalty agreements” with one another before the marriage or during the marriage to safeguard their own rights and consolidate the marital relationship. In the current law of our country, there is no uniform standard on the validity of “loyalty agreement”, which makes the court unable to handle the case in similar cases, resulting in different judgments of the same case. Taking the cases of two cases in Shandong Province and Hebei Province as examples, the author summarizes the viewpoints of holding different opinions on the theory of “loyalty agreement” and combining the theory of “loyalty agreement” Loyalty agreement "effectiveness of the legal and institutional construction made its own recommendations.