论文部分内容阅读
刑法第91条第2款的适用应根据行为主体的不同确定:与该财产无关的第三人侵犯该财产的,成立相应的财产罪。该财产的原权利人以非法手段取回该财产,如果侵犯了对方的他物权,则构成相应的财产罪;如果只是侵犯了对方基于公共秩序管理需要的占有,则不成立财产罪。国家机关、国有公司、企业、集体企业和人民团体中的相关工作人员利用职务之便,侵吞在本单位管理、使用或者运输中的私人财产的,根据行为人身份的不同,分别成立贪污罪或职务侵占罪。
The application of Article 91, paragraph 2, of the Criminal Law should be determined according to the different actors: a third party who has nothing to do with the property infringes the property and establishes the corresponding property crime. If the original owner of the property recovered the property illegally, if he violated each other’s property rights, it would constitute a corresponding crime of property; if only violated the other’s possession based on the needs of public order management, the property would not be established. In the course of taking advantage of their positions, relevant personnel in state organs, state-owned companies, enterprises, collective enterprises and mass organizations embezzle private property in the management, use or transit of their own units, and according to their identities, set up corruption offenses or Duty embezzlement.