论文部分内容阅读
草甘膦,一个平凡而又神奇的农药;一个具有争议而又生命力旺盛的庄稼保护神;一个生性不平静的精灵,在农业植保的竞争市场下,上演了一幕幕的剧情。近年来,草甘膦成为行业内人士争相讨论的一大话题。2014年,草甘膦又迎来了风雨一年。著名前央视主持人崔永元亲赴美国拍摄转基因纪录片,调查转基因真相。在其纪录片视频32分13秒处,一位叫做罗伯特·斯特里特的美国爱荷华州农场主牛气冲天、得意洋洋地说:“跟我辩论的科学家都说草甘膦安全,但没有一个肯喝草甘膦原液的。”纪录片中涉及的专有名词——草甘膦、Bt杀虫晶体蛋白,成为网民关注的热点。小崔纪录片里有个非常大的硬伤,那就是在论证草甘膦毒性的时候,采取了能不能吃的论证方法,这个确实是一个非常不科学的论证方法。草甘膦不是食物,绝对是不能食用
Glyphosate, an ordinary and magical pesticide; a controversial but vigorous crop protection god; a non-tranquil genie who staged scenes in a competitive market for agricultural plant protection. In recent years, glyphosate has become a topic of debate in the industry. In 2014, glyphosate ushered in a stormy year. Cui Yongyuan famous former CCTV host went to the United States to shoot transgenic documentary to investigate the truth of the genetically modified. At 32 minutes and 13 seconds on his documentary video, a farmer in Iowa, United States, Robert Stritt, said in good spirits, “The scientists who debated with me said glyphosate was safe but None of the proper nouns involved in the. ”Documentary of glyphosate drinking - glyphosate, Bt insecticidal crystal protein, has become a hot spot for Internet users. There is a very large mishap in the documentary of Xiao-chi, that is, when demonstrating the toxicity of glyphosate, it is a very unscientific way of arguing that we should take an argumentative approach that we can not eat. Glyphosate is not food, absolutely can not eat