大学生艾滋病污名问卷的编制

来源 :中国临床心理学杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:zfh115101
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:编制大学生艾滋病污名问卷。方法:在文献分析和访谈的基础上,确定编制问卷的维度并收集项目。对280名大学生进行问卷的预测,对数据进行项目分析和探索性因素分析,确定问卷项目,形成正式问卷。对275名大学生进行问卷的正式测验,对数据进行验证性因素分析和信度分析。结果:艾滋病污名问卷由道德评判、接近恐惧与法律和社会福利三个维度构成,三个因素累计方差贡献率45.898%,旋转后的各项目负荷均在0.5以上。问卷的内部一致性系数(Cronbach’sα)、分半信度和重测信度分别是0.879、0.848和0.861。验证性因素分析结果表明三因子模型有良好的拟合指数(χ2/df=1.88,CFI=0.98,NFI=0.95,GFI=0.97,NNFI=0.97,IFI=0.98,AGFI=0.90,RFI=0.94,RMSEA=0.057)。结论:大学生艾滋病污名问卷有较好的心理测量学特性。 Objective: To prepare college students AIDS stigma questionnaire. Methods: Based on the literature analysis and interviews, determine the dimensions of the questionnaire and collect the items. 280 college students were asked to predict the project, the data analysis and exploratory factor analysis to determine the questionnaire project to form a formal questionnaire. 275 college students conducted a formal test of the questionnaire, the data for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis. Results: The AIDS stigma questionnaire consisted of three dimensions: moral judgment, approaching fear, law and social welfare. The cumulative contribution rate of three factors was 45.898%, and the post-rotation load of all projects was above 0.5. The internal consistency coefficient of the questionnaire (Cronbach’s α), fractional half-confidence and test-retest reliability were 0.879, 0.848 and 0.861, respectively. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the three-factor model had good fit index (χ2 / df = 1.88, CFI = 0.98, NFI = 0.95, GFI = 0.97, NNFI = 0.97, IFI = 0.98, AGFI = 0.90, RFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.057). Conclusion: The college student AIDS stigma questionnaire has better psychometric characteristics.
其他文献
防空反导战斗部击中并击爆来袭导弹的战斗部是最有效的反导方式,直接击毁战斗部对于近程和超近程反导意义尤其重要。主要对惰性破片、聚能射流、爆炸成型弹丸(EFP)和活性破片
目的 探索对成人急性白血病患者临床预防侵袭性真菌感染的有效方法.方法 采用非随机同期对照实验的方法,将符合实验标准的84例急性白血病患者分为实验组和对照组,每组42例.实