论文部分内容阅读
在我国经济社会快速发展的过程中,各类社会矛盾纠纷日益凸显,不断探索解决社会矛盾纠纷的新机制,成为当前法学研究与法律实践中的热点之一。“北川模式”、“南通模式”、“厦门模式”、“陵县经验”、“枫桥经验”是几种有代表性的社会矛盾纠纷解决机制,通过对它们各自基本内涵的异同进行比较后发现,“北川模式”更符合多元化纠纷解决机制的要求,更值得借鉴与推广。
In the process of rapid economic and social development in our country, various types of social conflicts and disputes have become increasingly prominent, and constantly exploring new mechanisms for resolving social conflicts and disputes has become one of the hot spots in the current jurisprudence research and legal practice. “Beichuan mode ”, “Nantong mode ”, “Xiamen mode ”, “Lingxian experience ”, “Fengqiao experience ” is the representative of several social conflicts and disputes resolution mechanism, through After comparing their similarities and differences in their basic connotation, they found that “Beichuan” is more in line with the requirements of a wide range of dispute resolution mechanisms and more worthy of reference and promotion.