刑事侦查权的司法介入

来源 :北方法学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:murrayxu
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
我国刑事权运行中存在侦查机关的自行决定权力过大,检察机关的法律监督制约简单肤浅、流于形式,犯罪嫌疑人的辩护形无力虚,刑事诉讼参与人特别是犯罪嫌疑人缺乏有效的权利救济手段和途径的情况,使刑事侦查权因缺乏有效的监督制约而明显失衡,从而导致刑事司法权威与公信力的缺失。根据我国的司法实践结合国际公约的要求,必须在刑事侦查阶段建立中立、公正而又及时的司法审查,由法官主持司法介入审查刑事侦查权力行使的合法性,以防止侦查中滥用强制性措施对犯罪嫌疑人造成伤害,避免侦查权的异化,依法制约和规范刑事侦查行为,完善司法审判权的设置运行。 The existence of power of criminal investigation in the operation of criminal rights in our country is too large. The legal supervision and restriction of procuratorial organs is simple and superficial, and forms a formality. The defense of criminal suspects is weak and the criminal procedure participants, especially criminal suspects, lack effective rights Relief means and ways to make the criminal investigation right obviously lack the balance due to the lack of effective supervision and restriction, resulting in the lack of authority and credibility of criminal justice. According to the judicial practice of our country and the requirements of international conventions, it is necessary to establish a neutral, fair and timely judicial review in the criminal investigation stage, and the judge presides over the judiciary to intervene to examine the legality of the criminal investigation power to prevent abuse of coercive measures in investigation Criminal suspects cause harm, avoid alienation of investigative powers, restrict and regulate criminal investigation according to law, and improve the setup and operation of judicial jurisdiction.
其他文献