论文部分内容阅读
“物”是唯物史观的核心词,也是它的基石,但要站在变与不变的立场上对待唯物史观,不变的是它的基本理念,变的是“物”的具体形态。而就“物”在人类社会历史中的作用而言,也不是单一的和绝对的,尚有人类的精神及其外化形式渗透其中。要在唯物史观和唯心史观之间作出非此即彼的抉择,这本身就是成问题的思维,因为人类社会的构成方式和维系过程是极为复杂的,绝非单一的质料与精神所能决定的了的。即便在对“物”的研究上,也应该把分析的规定与规范的要求结合起来,在“是”与“应当”之间寻找其相互过渡的内在逻辑,把事实逻辑与价值逻辑结合起来。既然“物”是流动的,那就要深入而全面地分析现代性语境中的“物”及其流动形态。总之,要在变与不变之间(态度)、“心”与“物”之间(原则)、分析与规范之间(方法)和现代与后现代之间(语境)看待、对待和引领流动的“物”和唯物史观。在原则指引下、在方法指导下、在现代与后现代语境中见出唯物史观之“物”的诸种形态。
“Material ” is the core of materialist conception of history, but also its cornerstone, but to stand on the unchanged and unchanged position on materialist conception of history, the same is its basic idea, change is “The specific form. However, as far as the role of ”things “ in the history of human society is concerned, it is neither single nor absolute. The human spirit and the externalized form permeate it. To make a choice between the historical materialism and the idealistic historical viewpoint is itself problematic thinking because the way in which human society is constructed and maintained is extremely complex and not a single material and spiritual power It was decided. Even in the research of ”things “, the rules of analysis should be combined with the normative requirements, and the internal logic of mutual transition should be found between ”yes “ and ”should “, and the fact logic Combined with the logic of value. Since ”matter “ is fluid, it is necessary to thoroughly and comprehensively analyze the ”thing “ in the context of modernity and its flowing patterns. In short, between the ”change“ and ”change“ (attitude), between ”heart“ and ”thing“ (principle), between analysis and regulation (method) and between modern and postmodernity (context) Treat, treat and lead the flowing ”things“ and historical materialism. Guided by the principle, under the guidance of the method, we can see the various forms of ”material " in the historical materialism in the modern and postmodern contexts.