主持人话语:新世纪以来,就中国史研究而言,其视角逐步下移,着力讲求深耕细耘和扎实厚重,涌现出一大批关注社会底层和具体细节的学术成果,佳作迭出,成绩斐然,然其“碎片化”倾向亦略显端倪;同时数十年来,学界关注的理论话题和宏大叙事,如长期停滞说、冲击反应说等,大多来自以美、欧为代表的西方汉学界,出自中国学者自身的理论建树和提炼概括亦不多见。这种情势或许是中国学人在国际汉学界的话语权不足之重要肇因,善谋者当思改进之策。实际上,我国学人在中国史研究的深度和广度上绝不输于域外学者,理应在事关中国 Moderator discourse: Since the new century, as far as the study of Chinese history goes, its perspective has been gradually shifted down. With a focus on deep plowing and a solid foundation, a large number of academic achievements have been popularized that pay attention to the bottom and specific details of society. At the same time, theoretical topics and grand narratives that the academic community has been paying attention to for decades, such as long-term stagnation and impulse response, are mostly from Western sinology represented by the United States and Europe , From Chinese scholars own theory and refinement summary is rare. This situation may be an important cause of the Chinese scholars’ lack of voice in international sinology. In fact, scholars in our country must never lose their scholarship in the depth and breadth of Chinese history research and should be concerned with China