论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比冠状动脉造影术(CAG)与冠脉介入治疗(PC I)术后,应用经皮血管闭合器(Angio-SealTM)与人工压迫止血对患者止血时间、制动时间及并发症的发生率,评价Angio-SealTM止血疗效及安全性,并对其操作要点进行归纳总结。方法:将接受CAG与PC I术的患者277例,分为Angio-SealTM组(107例)与人工压迫止血组(170例),观察两组患者止血时间、卧床及制动时间、并发症的发生率。结果:Angio-SealTM止血组与人工压迫止血组相比,止血时间、卧床及制动时间显著缩短,血管并发症明显降低。应用Angio-SealTM止血成功率97%。结论:Angio-SealTM止血明显优于人工压迫止血。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the hemostatic time, braking time and complications of patients undergoing CAG and PCI after operation with Angio-SealTM and artificial compression hemostasis Rate, evaluation of Angio-SealTM hemostasis efficacy and safety, and summarize the main points of its operation. Methods: A total of 277 patients undergoing CAG and PC I surgery were divided into Angio-SealTM group (n = 107) and artificial oppression hemostasis group (n = 170). The bleeding time, bed rest and braking time, complications Occurrence rate. Results: Compared with artificial hemostasis group, the bleeding time, bed rest and braking time of Angio-SealTM hemostasis group were significantly shortened and vascular complications were significantly reduced. Application Angio-SealTM hemostasis success rate of 97%. Conclusion: Angio-SealTM hemostasis is superior to manual compression to stop bleeding.